Free tool
Is this headline doing any work
This scores a headline on five structural checks: character length for where it will appear, word count, whether it opens with something concrete, whether it contains a number, and whether the claim is specific enough to verify. Every failed check returns a rewrite instruction rather than a grade.
Last reviewed 27 August 2026
Result
Headline score
92 / 100
55 characters, 12 words
The five checks
| Check | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Length for this surface | 55 chars against 50 to 60 | 25 / 25 |
| Word count | 12 against a limit of 12 | 15 / 15 |
| Opening word | "How" reads as functional | 12 / 20 |
| Contains a number | Yes | 15 / 15 |
| Claim is checkable | Yes | 15 / 15 |
| Free of vague wording | Yes | 10 / 10 |
What to change
- It opens on "How", which is functional rather than concrete. That is fine for a how-to, but a version that leads with the specific noun will read harder at the same length.
The target term appears in the first half, which is where a truncated result still shows it. No click-through rate is predicted here, and you should distrust anything that predicts one for you: those figures come from one publisher's own archive and do not transfer to your audience. The checks above are structural, which is the part that does transfer.
How this works
What the numbers mean.
- 01Length is checked against where the headline will appear. Search results truncate at a pixel width that works out around 55 to 60 characters for most title text, a landing page H1 is read in a single glance so shorter reads harder, and a social hook competes with a feed.
- 02The opening word check looks at the first word carrying meaning after articles. Abstractions like future, potential, and importance name a category. Concrete nouns name a thing, and a thing is what a reader recognises without effort.
- 03Specificity is inferred from numbers, currency, percentages, comparison words, and proper nouns. These are the markers that turn an assertion into something a reader can check, which is the difference between a headline and a slogan.
- 04The score is the sum of six weighted checks. Read the table rather than the total: a headline losing 25 points on length needs a different fix from one losing 25 on vagueness.
Assumptions and limits
- The weighting is ours, not an industry standard. The individual checks are the output. The total is a summary of them.
- No click-through rate is predicted or implied. Published headline benchmarks are drawn from one publisher's archive and one audience, and they do not generalise to yours.
- Word lists cannot judge context. A word that is vague in one headline is precise in another, so read every flag before acting on it.
- A headline that passes every check can still be dishonest. Nothing here verifies that the piece delivers what the headline promises.
Questions about this tool
How long should a headline be?
Do numbers actually help a headline?
Why does this not predict click-through rate?
What counts as a vague word?
This tool is free and there is nothing to sign up for. If you would rather have the work done than calculate it, that is what Zway does.